If you have not used a spinner before then I would suggest that you first use something that require more human imput like The Best Spinner or Spinner Chief in order to understand the basic principles. However if you must go fully auto then I would suggest you go for Wicked Article Creator. I have it and understand it is similar to wordAI but a one off fee of $47.


I think it is better to just come up with your own content. Most of those type of programs that are designed to make things easier, really just make things more difficult. You are right. The more you write, the more practice you get, and the better you’ll become. I have been writing for years myself, and I have never needed any content generation programs.

Anyone may carry out this, all you need is a new computer system and the capability to chain a phrase together. You can create original content articles and submit them to post directories and obtain compensated. You have to apply to these websites and may or may not really get switched down. If you should occur to obtain switched down after that just maintain plugging away until you discover somebody to "employ" you.
(function(){"use strict";function s(e){return"function"==typeof e||"object"==typeof e&&null!==e}function a(e){return"function"==typeof e}function l(e){X=e}function u(e){G=e}function c(){return function(){r.nextTick(p)}}function f(){var e=0,n=new ne(p),t=document.createTextNode("");return n.observe(t,{characterData:!0}),function(){t.data=e=++e%2}}function d(){var e=new MessageChannel;return e.port1.onmessage=p,function(){e.port2.postMessage(0)}}function h(){return function(){setTimeout(p,1)}}function p(){for(var e=0;et.length)&&(n=t.length),n-=e.length;var r=t.indexOf(e,n);return-1!==r&&r===n}),String.prototype.startsWith||(String.prototype.startsWith=function(e,n){return n=n||0,this.substr(n,e.length)===e}),String.prototype.trim||(String.prototype.trim=function(){return this.replace(/^[\s\uFEFF\xA0]+|[\s\uFEFF\xA0]+$/g,"")}),String.prototype.includes||(String.prototype.includes=function(e,n){"use strict";return"number"!=typeof n&&(n=0),!(n+e.length>this.length)&&-1!==this.indexOf(e,n)})},"./shared/require-global.js":function(e,n,t){e.exports=t("./shared/require-shim.js")},"./shared/require-shim.js":function(e,n,t){var r=t("./shared/errors.js"),i=(this.window,!1),o=null,s=null,a=new Promise(function(e,n){o=e,s=n}),l=function(e){if(!l.hasModule(e)){var n=new Error('Cannot find module "'+e+'"');throw n.code="MODULE_NOT_FOUND",n}return t("./"+e+".js")};l.loadChunk=function(e){return a.then(function(){return"main"==e?t.e("main").then(function(e){t("./main.js")}.bind(null,t))["catch"](t.oe):"dev"==e?Promise.all([t.e("main"),t.e("dev")]).then(function(e){t("./shared/dev.js")}.bind(null,t))["catch"](t.oe):"internal"==e?Promise.all([t.e("main"),t.e("internal"),t.e("qtext2"),t.e("dev")]).then(function(e){t("./internal.js")}.bind(null,t))["catch"](t.oe):"ads_manager"==e?Promise.all([t.e("main"),t.e("ads_manager")]).then(function(e){undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined}.bind(null,t))["catch"](t.oe):"publisher_dashboard"==e?t.e("publisher_dashboard").then(function(e){undefined,undefined}.bind(null,t))["catch"](t.oe):"content_widgets"==e?Promise.all([t.e("main"),t.e("content_widgets")]).then(function(e){t("./content_widgets.iframe.js")}.bind(null,t))["catch"](t.oe):void 0})},l.whenReady=function(e,n){Promise.all(window.webpackChunks.map(function(e){return l.loadChunk(e)})).then(function(){n()})},l.installPageProperties=function(e,n){window.Q.settings=e,window.Q.gating=n,i=!0,o()},l.assertPagePropertiesInstalled=function(){i||(s(),r.logJsError("installPageProperties","The install page properties promise was rejected in require-shim."))},l.prefetchAll=function(){t("./settings.js");Promise.all([t.e("main"),t.e("qtext2")]).then(function(){}.bind(null,t))["catch"](t.oe)},l.hasModule=function(e){return!!window.NODE_JS||t.m.hasOwnProperty("./"+e+".js")},l.execAll=function(){var e=Object.keys(t.m);try{for(var n=0;n=c?n():document.fonts.load(u(o,'"'+o.family+'"'),a).then(function(n){1<=n.length?e():setTimeout(t,25)},function(){n()})}t()});var w=new Promise(function(e,n){l=setTimeout(n,c)});Promise.race([w,m]).then(function(){clearTimeout(l),e(o)},function(){n(o)})}else t(function(){function t(){var n;(n=-1!=y&&-1!=g||-1!=y&&-1!=v||-1!=g&&-1!=v)&&((n=y!=g&&y!=v&&g!=v)||(null===f&&(n=/AppleWebKit\/([0-9]+)(?:\.([0-9]+))/.exec(window.navigator.userAgent),f=!!n&&(536>parseInt(n[1],10)||536===parseInt(n[1],10)&&11>=parseInt(n[2],10))),n=f&&(y==b&&g==b&&v==b||y==x&&g==x&&v==x||y==j&&g==j&&v==j)),n=!n),n&&(null!==_.parentNode&&_.parentNode.removeChild(_),clearTimeout(l),e(o))}function d(){if((new Date).getTime()-h>=c)null!==_.parentNode&&_.parentNode.removeChild(_),n(o);else{var e=document.hidden;!0!==e&&void 0!==e||(y=p.a.offsetWidth,g=m.a.offsetWidth,v=w.a.offsetWidth,t()),l=setTimeout(d,50)}}var p=new r(a),m=new r(a),w=new r(a),y=-1,g=-1,v=-1,b=-1,x=-1,j=-1,_=document.createElement("div");_.dir="ltr",i(p,u(o,"sans-serif")),i(m,u(o,"serif")),i(w,u(o,"monospace")),_.appendChild(p.a),_.appendChild(m.a),_.appendChild(w.a),document.body.appendChild(_),b=p.a.offsetWidth,x=m.a.offsetWidth,j=w.a.offsetWidth,d(),s(p,function(e){y=e,t()}),i(p,u(o,'"'+o.family+'",sans-serif')),s(m,function(e){g=e,t()}),i(m,u(o,'"'+o.family+'",serif')),s(w,function(e){v=e,t()}),i(w,u(o,'"'+o.family+'",monospace'))})})},void 0!==e?e.exports=a:(window.FontFaceObserver=a,window.FontFaceObserver.prototype.load=a.prototype.load)}()},"./third_party/tracekit.js":function(e,n){/**
By the way, I check all these spins and compare them using DiffChecker in order to easily see what has changed. And as you can see, the “Turing” spinner of WordAI really focuses on rewriting the structure and flow of the sentences of the content as opposed to focusing on exchanging words with synonyms, which is of course why the result content is extremely human readable.
That’s really weird. I have tested WordAI and Spin Rewriter with Copyscape and the results were always 80%+ uniquness, even 90%+. I don’t know how u spun the content to achieve such low results, but this is definitely way too bad. As for the block spinning, I have to be honest, this is the first time I’m hearing of it and I will have to check it out when I have a bit of time, but generally, yes, in the best case scenario, you would manually touch your Tier 1 content to make it 100% human readable and as unique as possible. For lower tiers, you can do pretty much anything, but again, the better quality of content, the better results you will have. That’s in my opinion and experience.

In simple terms, if we define the term spinning, then it is all known as about rewriting of the paragraph or even the whole of the paper straight in your own words. Unlike into the concept of the summarizing, you will be keeping every single thing as rough and in the same length as the original one. You can easily perform this task as by means of going through the original and hence changing every other word for the purpose of the synonym by means of using the thesaurus. You should be finding yourself as all the time repeating on with the portions of the original document.

Not sure about version 1, but I'm testing version 2 right now and I have to say it's the best auto spinner I've seen bar none. The content is actually extremely readable and probably better than the manual spins a lot of people do out there. However, some of the content doesn't pass copyscape so make sure you play around with the settings. Minor edits should do the trick. I'm on the trial now but seriously thinking of keeping the Turing plan for my Tier 1 content.
There is a completely new feature - Team Version, SpinnerChief 5 is the only article spinner that has a team version now, which is especially designed for team using, create/manage/use team thesaurus with team members together, and multi-users can use the license on different computer with themselves member accounts. Manager can manage team members easily.
Are you struggling to have a proper understanding of an article rewriter or text spinner tool? Don’t worry, we can help you. It is a simple tool that can work online or offline depending on its functionality. An article rewriter or article spinner or paraphrasing tool is a simple yet efficient tool that understands the text you enter and then rewrite it for you. Article rewriter allows you to have your article rewritten without having to go through any trouble. Any good and quality article spinner tool will not just save your time but saves you from the pain of sitting in front of your computer screen for hours and hours to create a unique and plagiarism free content. Article spinner or article rewriter is just a tool that aids you in doing your work more efficiently. The real authority over your work remains with you, you can read the newly created article yourself and make the mandatory changes. Sometimes the article created by an article rewriter doesn’t make sense or content could be plagiarized, therefore we highly recommend you to proofread the article before using it.
If you have not used a spinner before then I would suggest that you first use something that require more human imput like The Best Spinner or Spinner Chief in order to understand the basic principles. However if you must go fully auto then I would suggest you go for Wicked Article Creator. I have it and understand it is similar to wordAI but a one off fee of $47.
Spin Rewriter 5.0 technology was a previous edition that allowed their clients to use the basic article rewriting system.  Their newer versions over the years have just kept getting better and better.   The new Spin Rewriter 9.0 technology gives you the option of assigning variables to your content.  Their software is dead easy to use.  In just three steps you can have up to 50 uniquely spun articles.
AnswersChief is the best professional market promotion software that aimed at YAHOO!ANSWERS. And the tailor-made AnswersChief aims at the newest version of YAHOO!ANSWERS. Not only can you automatically submit questions and answers with AnsweChief, but you can also insert images to your questions and answers. Even without submitting a link, customers will visit your site.
I've ranked websites in the past with spun content, and now they are still on #1 position of google. First year (2014) google found me because my spun was really bad, many paragraphs were just copied and my position drop from #2 to around #20 after a panda update. Later I cleaned all my text with better spun (I didn't buy any article!), my ranking went up again, and with more backlinks I reached #1 and it is still there
As you can see, WordAI is a lot more loose with the meaning of the text and uses synonyms wherever it can in order to produce the most unique content possible – this one is calculated at 98% uniqueness. Again, the purpose of such content should be for the lower tiers where you would need a higher quantity of links with not that high quality content.
Start with a quality article. This means a unique topic or viewpoint on a very specific topic. The information must be valuable to a human reader. At this point in time, it is not possible for any software program to produce content that is engaging. If you start out with a low-quality article, the chances are high that the alternate versions are going to be even worse.
Hey Cathy, thanks for sharing about WordAi. It certainly is interesting, to say the least. I guess at some point all of us would want to automate our business and will look into programs like these for a solution. The example you showed gave me a very clear indication that the algorithm isn’t quite there yet. You seem too lenient in grading it because to me, it is practically unreadable. I believe hiring writers is a better use of that money.
Has a 250,000 words monthly limit on the “Turing Spinner” and a 2,500,000 words monthly limit on the “Standard Spinner”. Anything above that will be charged additionally ($10 per 1,000,000 words for the “Standard Spinner”, and $3 per 10,000 for the “Turing Spinner”). However, they do offer custom plans for heavy API users – all you need to do is contact them.
Most people don’t know that spinning content on their website truly optimizes their search among other users. However, it’s important to avoid using duplicate content because search engines will penalize you.  This practice is best avoided at all times if you truly want your site to rank in search engines like Google. Spin Rewriter ensures that your spun articles pass Copyscape to give you peace of mind that your content is unique. Spin Rewriter 9.0 allows you to rewrite articles using SEO techniques so that you can rank for certain keywords.  When you rank for more keywords you will be attracting more visitors to your site organically.  With a steady traffic flow to your blogs, you’ll find making bank easier than ever. Whether you use AdWords, sell Amazon products, or run affiliate offers, a reliable online income is now within your grasp.
We tried and we tested. We spinned and we unspinned. After all said and done here, I think you should have already made your choice about which spinner is best for you. If you will be doing a lot of manual spinning, then The Best Spinner is probably the best choice. On the other hand, if you will be using the spinner just for automatic spinning, and you have enough capital, WordAI is the spinning tool for you. But if you are still on a budget, Spin Rewriter is your spinner. However, if you are going to be spinning text in languages other than English, you might want to go with either Spinner Chief or Chimp Rewriter. The choice is all yours. You can now make an informed decision.

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 158.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
This article spinner is known to have a team of friendly customer service representatives that are more than glad to accept any issues. Whenever theres a problem with the server or the system in terms of its features and functionality, then you can always escalate the problem to the best representatives available by submitting a ticket so that it can be resolved as soon as you reach out to them.
Think of it this way: What do you have more chance of hitting, a distant, tiny target or the broad side of a barn? For the sake of search engine optimization, you want your website to be the broad side of barn. The more quality articles, or unique readable content, your website or blog offers to search engines (and therefore the general public) the more exposure your website will receive from major search engines.
There is also the option to spin capitalized words (assumed to be proper nouns) as well as leave any number of words unchanged, depending on whatever you enter into the "ignore" field, separated by commas. You also have the option to only keep the sentences that were altered a minimum percentage, as indicated by the "Keep Sentences that Changed" option.
There are a lot of spinners on the market, some are OK and others are just plain junk. If you are asking why The Best Spinner isn’t in this comparison it is because currently TBS is not producing the results we need for higher quality spins. Sure you can hand tweak your articles to be perfect, but in our business time is money. The less time I have to spend on tedious tasks is more time I have for making money. While no spinner will produce perfect results, these two do a great job of getting you closer to human readable content. To us that means content that reads in a linear fashion with proper verbs and nouns. So below we will show the results of spun articles by these two top spinners.

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 158.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Once upon a right time there lived a child. He had eyes that are blue blond locks because yellow as gold. The boy that is young small and fragile, but their mind was swift like the wind. He could calculate the results of any situation in the blink of an eye fixed. But that had not been their talent that is biggest. No. His talent that is biggest was perception. The child that is young comprehend and perceive anything faster than anyone he previously ever met. Then, he fell so in love with a princess that is breathtaking. She had magnetic green eyes and light locks that is brown. She was loved by him very much and she loved him back also more. There is only 1 problem – the boy that is young the son of a blacksmith. The princess’s father would not allow her to marry a son that is simple of blacksmith. But their love was too strong. The young boy raised an army of undead and started a rebellion to overthrow the wicked master who did not have confidence in true love in one fell swoop. The young kid ended up being assassinated and the war was over after months of fighting against the armies of his beloved’s father. No songs were sang.
×